What you could do is purchase SMTP injection services from a company that
offers it (say www.dnsmadeeasy.com) for about $9.95 a year. What you get is
the ability to inject SMTP-AUTH on a few ports other than 25. This would
bypass your potential ISP restrictions on Port 25.
The question in my mind is whether the blocking is done based on the point
of origin (your server) or on the server trying to relay the message (the
server belonging to the company whose services you purchase). It would have
to be the latter, otherwise you couldn't really send e-mail at all.
So, modify your mail setup to hand off the Bugzilla e-mails via SMTP-AUTH to
a service you purchase, and you should be fine ....
-----Original Message-----
From:
[hidden email]
[mailto:
[hidden email]]On Behalf Of Ferindo
Middleton
Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2005 10:10 PM
To:
[hidden email]
Cc: Jeff Jensen
Subject: Re: email sent from bugzilla looks like spam to the internet
I suppose this is not really problem with bugzilla but rather my own
problem with my ISP. Or maybe adding POP3 service as a method
transporting mail message with bugzilla is more of an enhancement since
there is apparently no way to configure it.
Ferindo
Ferindo Middleton wrote:
> Jeff Jensen wrote:
>> With a dynamic IP like that, how can you serve a website??
>>
>> Is it an option to get a static IP from your ISP?
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From:
[hidden email]
>> [mailto:
[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Ferindo
>> Middleton
>> Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2005 8:21 PM
>> To:
[hidden email]
>> Subject: Re: email sent from bugzilla looks like spam to the internet
>>
>> Joel Peshkin wrote:
>>> Ferindo Middleton wrote:
>>>> Is there a way to setup bugzilla to transport mail using a POP3
>>>> account. I tried using SMTP, but when the email gets to the my
>>>> user's ISP's, the ISP's junk email filters either put the mails from
>>>> my server in the users bulk mail folder or refuse delivering it at
>>>> all...
>>>> This happens if I set mail to be sent via sendmail OR SMTP... I
>>>> tried both and the mail gets treated the same. If however, I can
>>>> send email from bugzilla using my ISP's POP3 service, the mail won't
>>>> look like spam. I think this is because "relaying" or something
>>>> isn't involved that way. Is there any one else out there that using
>>>> a DSL connection with a similar problem?
>>>>
>>>> Ferindo
>>> I have never seen bugmail classified as SPAM so long as the return
>>> address is considered to be a legitimate address in all ways. Change
>>> the from address in your bugmail to exactly the same address you use
>>> for other mail. I suspect that will take care of the problem.
>>>
>>
>> I believe the problem exists with my servers IP address. I use a DSL
>> connection to serve my website and my IP address is assigned dynamically.
>> The Internet knows this and my other ISP's consider my IP address and any
>> mail messages associated with it to be, well, at least not entirely
>> trustworthy. This is why I believe mail messages are failing to get
>> delivered from bugzilla. This problem exists with other systems and user
>> accounts that send email from my server through sendmail as well. I
>> take it
>> you probably use a server with a static IP address?
>>
>> Ferindo
>> _______________________________________________
>> mozilla-webtools mailing list
>>
[hidden email]
>>
http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-webtools>>
>
> I have to pay more, over twice as much for the service, to have a static
> IP address. My domain is sleekcollar.com. I use a dynamic forwarding
> service offered through zoneedit.com to forward all traffic to my domain
> to my server, which my server keeps it constantly up-to-date on my
> current ip address.
>
> Ferindo
_______________________________________________
mozilla-webtools mailing list
[hidden email]
http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-webtools_______________________________________________
mozilla-webtools mailing list
[hidden email]
http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-webtools
Locked
