On Feb 10, 2014, at 11:20 AM, Michael Dyck wrote:
> On 14-02-10 08:37 AM, Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
>> I'd suggest grouping all minor editorial bugs by chapter. That's how
>> I'll process them.
>
> So, just to be clear, a "chapter" is what the spec itself (usually) calls a
> "clause"? (I.e., the main body of the spec has 26 of them.) If so, that
> means I'll only have to create 20 bugs, yay.
yes
>
>> As noted in the release notes, Rev 22 is particularly rough WRT
>> algorithm formatting because of some technical issues I was still
>> working through. Don't bother reporting those sorts of issues for this
>> revision. I already know about them.
>
> The release notes mention "(extra line spacing, wrong left margin)". It
> turns out that my pipeline is oblivious to such issues (as long as the left
> margin is consistent within a given algorithm).
>
> What about metavariables losing their italicization: is that something I
> shouldn't bother reporting on? I submitted Bug 2428, in the hopes of
> covering them all, but if you need a complete list, I could incorporate
> that into my comments.
sure, add the complete list to bug 2428
the Alg1-Alg3 styles are being incrementally phased out in favor of consistent use of Alg4 to address other list related issue. It is easy for this sorts bugs to slip through the process so certainly let me know what you find but feel free to aggregate them. It's easier for both of us that way.
>
>> Prioritize the reporting of actual semantic errors over minor editorial
>> issues.
>
> I think my comments are all editorial (some minor, some not). It takes all
> my time just to find those.
Obvious, the more major ones are higher priority and may deserve distinct bugs.
Thanks for all the great reports,
Allen
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss