SpiderMonkey 24 Standalone Release

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
19 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

SpiderMonkey 24 Standalone Release

i.stakenvicius
How is the version scheme going to work?

if this is being packaged out of ESR shouldn't it be 24.0.1 instead of 24.1.0 to match mozilla?
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: SpiderMonkey 24 Standalone Release

Tim-2

On 04/11/13 06:29, [hidden email] wrote:
> How is the version scheme going to work?
>
> if this is being packaged out of ESR shouldn't it be 24.0.1 instead of 24.1.0 to match mozilla?
the esr24 branch was bumped to 24.1, so that seems correct.

I have tested the tarball with my js24 port of gjs and it seems all fine. My only concern in the in-tree ICU, distro's are not going to like
this. So I would suggest we set --disable-intl-api by default. The other option would be to backport the system ICU patches, however I am not
sure that is worth blocking the release on.

Tim

> _______________________________________________
> dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine

_______________________________________________
dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: SpiderMonkey 24 Standalone Release

Sean Stangl
Thanks for testing! This is a new candidate that disables internationalization support by default rather than expecting distros to do the work. Since the change is minor, we can still plan for release on the 12th.

RC1:  https://people.mozilla.org/~sstangl/mozjs-24.1.0.rc1.tar.bz2
SHA1: c79f40e90a0cfdfc5f0d14491008fed13c489d54

Sean

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim" <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email]
Sent: Tuesday, November 5, 2013 4:53:56 AM
Subject: Re: SpiderMonkey 24 Standalone Release


On 04/11/13 06:29, [hidden email] wrote:
> How is the version scheme going to work?
>
> if this is being packaged out of ESR shouldn't it be 24.0.1 instead of 24.1.0 to match mozilla?
the esr24 branch was bumped to 24.1, so that seems correct.

I have tested the tarball with my js24 port of gjs and it seems all fine. My only concern in the in-tree ICU, distro's are not going to like
this. So I would suggest we set --disable-intl-api by default. The other option would be to backport the system ICU patches, however I am not
sure that is worth blocking the release on.

Tim

> _______________________________________________
> dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine

_______________________________________________
dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: SpiderMonkey 24 Standalone Release

i.stakenvicius
In reply to this post by i.stakenvicius
On Tuesday, November 5, 2013 7:53:56 AM UTC-5, Tim wrote:
>
> I have tested the tarball with my js24 port of gjs and it seems all fine. My only concern in the in-tree ICU, distro's are not going to like
>
> this. So I would suggest we set --disable-intl-api by default. The other option would be to backport the system ICU patches, however I am not


There's a patch that provides system-icu support in bug 851992 ( https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=851992 ), which has been accepted for mozilla-26 and which Gentoo Linux and others I believe will use for mozilla-24 in the meantime.  

Of course, getting it backported would be great, and even if we don't disable the intl api by default the distro maintainers always have the option to do that themselves.
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: SpiderMonkey 24 Standalone Release

i.stakenvicius
In reply to this post by Tim-2
On Tuesday, November 5, 2013 6:27:32 PM UTC-5, Sean Stangl wrote:
> Thanks for testing! This is a new candidate that disables internationalization support by default rather than expecting distros to do the work. Since the change is minor, we can still plan for release on the 12th.
>
> RC1:  https://people.mozilla.org/~sstangl/mozjs-24.1.0.rc1.tar.bz2
>
> SHA1: c79f40e90a0cfdfc5f0d14491008fed13c489d54


Looks great for Gentoo Linux, btw.
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: SpiderMonkey 24 Standalone Release

Tim-2
In reply to this post by i.stakenvicius

On 07/11/13 03:24, [hidden email] wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 5, 2013 7:53:56 AM UTC-5, Tim wrote:
>> I have tested the tarball with my js24 port of gjs and it seems all fine. My only concern in the in-tree ICU, distro's are not going to like
>>
>> this. So I would suggest we set --disable-intl-api by default. The other option would be to backport the system ICU patches, however I am not
>
> There's a patch that provides system-icu support in bug 851992 ( https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=851992 ), which has been accepted for mozilla-26 and which Gentoo Linux and others I believe will use for mozilla-24 in the meantime.  
I think it will require more than just that one patch to get system ICU working. However we never did get it working so can't say for sure.


>
> Of course, getting it backported would be great, and even if we don't disable the intl api by default the distro maintainers always have the option to do that themselves.
> _______________________________________________
> dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine

_______________________________________________
dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: SpiderMonkey 24 Standalone Release

Martin Rosenberg
The 24 tarball worked out of the box on ppc64.  Much better than 17.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim" <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email]
Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2013 5:16:38 AM
Subject: Re: SpiderMonkey 24 Standalone Release


On 07/11/13 03:24, [hidden email] wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 5, 2013 7:53:56 AM UTC-5, Tim wrote:
>> I have tested the tarball with my js24 port of gjs and it seems all fine. My only concern in the in-tree ICU, distro's are not going to like
>>
>> this. So I would suggest we set --disable-intl-api by default. The other option would be to backport the system ICU patches, however I am not
>
> There's a patch that provides system-icu support in bug 851992 ( https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=851992 ), which has been accepted for mozilla-26 and which Gentoo Linux and others I believe will use for mozilla-24 in the meantime.  
I think it will require more than just that one patch to get system ICU working. However we never did get it working so can't say for sure.


>
> Of course, getting it backported would be great, and even if we don't disable the intl api by default the distro maintainers always have the option to do that themselves.
> _______________________________________________
> dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine

_______________________________________________
dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: SpiderMonkey 24 Standalone Release

Tom Schuster
Thank you for making this release. As always our wiki could probably use
some love https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/SpiderMonkey/24! :)


On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Martin Rosenberg <[hidden email]>wrote:

> The 24 tarball worked out of the box on ppc64.  Much better than 17.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tim" <[hidden email]>
> To: [hidden email]
> Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2013 5:16:38 AM
> Subject: Re: SpiderMonkey 24 Standalone Release
>
>
> On 07/11/13 03:24, [hidden email] wrote:
> > On Tuesday, November 5, 2013 7:53:56 AM UTC-5, Tim wrote:
> >> I have tested the tarball with my js24 port of gjs and it seems all
> fine. My only concern in the in-tree ICU, distro's are not going to like
> >>
> >> this. So I would suggest we set --disable-intl-api by default. The
> other option would be to backport the system ICU patches, however I am not
> >
> > There's a patch that provides system-icu support in bug 851992 (
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=851992 ), which has been
> accepted for mozilla-26 and which Gentoo Linux and others I believe will
> use for mozilla-24 in the meantime.
> I think it will require more than just that one patch to get system ICU
> working. However we never did get it working so can't say for sure.
>
>
> >
> > Of course, getting it backported would be great, and even if we don't
> disable the intl api by default the distro maintainers always have the
> option to do that themselves.
> > _______________________________________________
> > dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine
> _______________________________________________
> dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine
>
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: SpiderMonkey 24 Standalone Release

Tim-2
In reply to this post by Martin Rosenberg
Just realised the tarball is missing the versioning of js shell. i.e. need to add the following patch

http://people.ubuntu.com/~ricotz/mozjs/mozjs24/patches/00trunk.patch


On 08/11/13 06:24, Martin Rosenberg wrote:

> The 24 tarball worked out of the box on ppc64.  Much better than 17.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tim" <[hidden email]>
> To: [hidden email]
> Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2013 5:16:38 AM
> Subject: Re: SpiderMonkey 24 Standalone Release
>
>
> On 07/11/13 03:24, [hidden email] wrote:
>> On Tuesday, November 5, 2013 7:53:56 AM UTC-5, Tim wrote:
>>> I have tested the tarball with my js24 port of gjs and it seems all fine. My only concern in the in-tree ICU, distro's are not going to like
>>>
>>> this. So I would suggest we set --disable-intl-api by default. The other option would be to backport the system ICU patches, however I am not
>> There's a patch that provides system-icu support in bug 851992 ( https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=851992 ), which has been accepted for mozilla-26 and which Gentoo Linux and others I believe will use for mozilla-24 in the meantime.  
> I think it will require more than just that one patch to get system ICU working. However we never did get it working so can't say for sure.
>
>
>> Of course, getting it backported would be great, and even if we don't disable the intl api by default the distro maintainers always have the option to do that themselves.
>> _______________________________________________
>> dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine
> _______________________________________________
> dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine

_______________________________________________
dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: SpiderMonkey 24 Standalone Release

Sean Stangl
Good catch, thanks.

RC2 includes that patch minus the Python bits, and a backport of Bug 634417.

RC2:  https://people.mozilla.org/~sstangl/mozjs-24.1.0.rc2.tar.bz2
SHA1: 54b7657f0f6110c92485723700af79fe8b373acd

We'll bump the release date by a week, with planned release on Tuesday, November 19. Please test and give feedback! And thank you to everyone for the feedback on the previous RCs.

Sean

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim" <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email]
Sent: Friday, November 8, 2013 12:27:02 PM
Subject: Re: SpiderMonkey 24 Standalone Release

Just realised the tarball is missing the versioning of js shell. i.e. need to add the following patch

http://people.ubuntu.com/~ricotz/mozjs/mozjs24/patches/00trunk.patch


On 08/11/13 06:24, Martin Rosenberg wrote:

> The 24 tarball worked out of the box on ppc64.  Much better than 17.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tim" <[hidden email]>
> To: [hidden email]
> Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2013 5:16:38 AM
> Subject: Re: SpiderMonkey 24 Standalone Release
>
>
> On 07/11/13 03:24, [hidden email] wrote:
>> On Tuesday, November 5, 2013 7:53:56 AM UTC-5, Tim wrote:
>>> I have tested the tarball with my js24 port of gjs and it seems all fine. My only concern in the in-tree ICU, distro's are not going to like
>>>
>>> this. So I would suggest we set --disable-intl-api by default. The other option would be to backport the system ICU patches, however I am not
>> There's a patch that provides system-icu support in bug 851992 ( https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=851992 ), which has been accepted for mozilla-26 and which Gentoo Linux and others I believe will use for mozilla-24 in the meantime.  
> I think it will require more than just that one patch to get system ICU working. However we never did get it working so can't say for sure.
>
>
>> Of course, getting it backported would be great, and even if we don't disable the intl api by default the distro maintainers always have the option to do that themselves.
>> _______________________________________________
>> dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine
> _______________________________________________
> dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine

_______________________________________________
dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: SpiderMonkey 24 Standalone Release

Tim-2
I have tested rc2 on Ubuntu and is working fine.

However I also have heard reports of virtualenv failing
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=711046#c34

Seems that virtualenv is quite unhappy when python optimization is enabled.


On 12/11/13 09:00, Sean Stangl wrote:

> Good catch, thanks.
>
> RC2 includes that patch minus the Python bits, and a backport of Bug 634417.
>
> RC2:  https://people.mozilla.org/~sstangl/mozjs-24.1.0.rc2.tar.bz2
> SHA1: 54b7657f0f6110c92485723700af79fe8b373acd
>
> We'll bump the release date by a week, with planned release on Tuesday, November 19. Please test and give feedback! And thank you to everyone for the feedback on the previous RCs.
>
> Sean
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tim" <[hidden email]>
> To: [hidden email]
> Sent: Friday, November 8, 2013 12:27:02 PM
> Subject: Re: SpiderMonkey 24 Standalone Release
>
> Just realised the tarball is missing the versioning of js shell. i.e. need to add the following patch
>
> http://people.ubuntu.com/~ricotz/mozjs/mozjs24/patches/00trunk.patch
>
>
> On 08/11/13 06:24, Martin Rosenberg wrote:
>> The 24 tarball worked out of the box on ppc64.  Much better than 17.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Tim" <[hidden email]>
>> To: [hidden email]
>> Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2013 5:16:38 AM
>> Subject: Re: SpiderMonkey 24 Standalone Release
>>
>>
>> On 07/11/13 03:24, [hidden email] wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, November 5, 2013 7:53:56 AM UTC-5, Tim wrote:
>>>> I have tested the tarball with my js24 port of gjs and it seems all fine. My only concern in the in-tree ICU, distro's are not going to like
>>>>
>>>> this. So I would suggest we set --disable-intl-api by default. The other option would be to backport the system ICU patches, however I am not
>>> There's a patch that provides system-icu support in bug 851992 ( https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=851992 ), which has been accepted for mozilla-26 and which Gentoo Linux and others I believe will use for mozilla-24 in the meantime.  
>> I think it will require more than just that one patch to get system ICU working. However we never did get it working so can't say for sure.
>>
>>
>>> Of course, getting it backported would be great, and even if we don't disable the intl api by default the distro maintainers always have the option to do that themselves.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine
>> _______________________________________________
>> dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine
> _______________________________________________
> dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine
> _______________________________________________
> dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine

_______________________________________________
dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: SpiderMonkey 24 Standalone Release

hummelebop
In reply to this post by Tim-2
Thanks for the standalone package,
Is there a way to compile that on Mswindows with Mingw?
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: SpiderMonkey 24 Standalone Release

Robin Ehrlich
In reply to this post by i.stakenvicius
Will Visual Studio 2013 be supported with this release? There is no
start-msvc12.bat file.


_______________________________________________
dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: SpiderMonkey 24 Standalone Release

Tim-2
Quite some problems building against a debug build of spidermonkey

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=939505

This, is IMO a bit of a blocker....

Tim

On 16/11/13 05:36, Robin Ehrlich wrote:
> Will Visual Studio 2013 be supported with this release? There is no start-msvc12.bat file.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine

_______________________________________________
dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: SpiderMonkey 24 Standalone Release

Sean Stangl
Delaying until the bug is resolved.

Sean

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim" <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email]
Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2013 2:30:28 AM
Subject: Re: SpiderMonkey 24 Standalone Release

Quite some problems building against a debug build of spidermonkey

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=939505

This, is IMO a bit of a blocker....

Tim

On 16/11/13 05:36, Robin Ehrlich wrote:
> Will Visual Studio 2013 be supported with this release? There is no start-msvc12.bat file.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine

_______________________________________________
dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: SpiderMonkey 24 Standalone Release

drovoxx
In reply to this post by Tim-2
On Monday, November 11, 2013 4:00:31 PM UTC-6, Sean Stangl wrote:

> Good catch, thanks.
>
>
>
> RC2 includes that patch minus the Python bits, and a backport of Bug 634417.
>
>
>
> RC2:  https://people.mozilla.org/~sstangl/mozjs-24.1.0.rc2.tar.bz2
>
> SHA1: 54b7657f0f6110c92485723700af79fe8b373acd
>
>
>
> We'll bump the release date by a week, with planned release on Tuesday, November 19. Please test and give feedback! And thank you to everyone for the feedback on the previous RCs.
>
>
>
> Sean
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: "Tim" <[hidden email]>
>
> To: [hidden email]
>
> Sent: Friday, November 8, 2013 12:27:02 PM
>
> Subject: Re: SpiderMonkey 24 Standalone Release
>
>
>
> Just realised the tarball is missing the versioning of js shell. i.e. need to add the following patch
>
>
>
> http://people.ubuntu.com/~ricotz/mozjs/mozjs24/patches/00trunk.patch
>
>
>
>
>
> On 08/11/13 06:24, Martin Rosenberg wrote:
>
> > The 24 tarball worked out of the box on ppc64.  Much better than 17.
>
> >
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
>
> > From: "Tim" <[hidden email]>
>
> > To: [hidden email]
>
> > Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2013 5:16:38 AM
>
> > Subject: Re: SpiderMonkey 24 Standalone Release
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > On 07/11/13 03:24, [hidden email] wrote:
>
> >> On Tuesday, November 5, 2013 7:53:56 AM UTC-5, Tim wrote:
>
> >>> I have tested the tarball with my js24 port of gjs and it seems all fine. My only concern in the in-tree ICU, distro's are not going to like
>
> >>>
>
> >>> this. So I would suggest we set --disable-intl-api by default. The other option would be to backport the system ICU patches, however I am not
>
> >> There's a patch that provides system-icu support in bug 851992 ( https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=851992 ), which has been accepted for mozilla-26 and which Gentoo Linux and others I believe will use for mozilla-24 in the meantime.  
>
> > I think it will require more than just that one patch to get system ICU working. However we never did get it working so can't say for sure.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >> Of course, getting it backported would be great, and even if we don't disable the intl api by default the distro maintainers always have the option to do that themselves.
>
> >> _______________________________________________
>
> >> dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
>
> >> [hidden email]
>
> >> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine
>
> > _______________________________________________
>
> > dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
>
> > [hidden email]
>
> > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
>
> [hidden email]
>
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine

suee
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: SpiderMonkey 24 Standalone Release

Sean Stangl
In reply to this post by Sean Stangl
Bug 939505 is now resolved. In the meantime, ESR24 bumped to 24.2.0.

RC3:  https://people.mozilla.org/~sstangl/mozjs-24.2.0.rc3.tar.bz2
SHA1: fb5bca92fe7087215048bbdfcf7f37446460da32

Next week is getting into holiday territory, so let's plan for a release later this week on Thursday, December 12. Feedback welcome, particularly on whether the DEBUG issues are verified resolved.

Sean

----- Original Message -----
From: "Sean Stangl" <[hidden email]>
To: "Tim" <[hidden email]>
Cc: [hidden email]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 11:45:22 AM
Subject: Re: SpiderMonkey 24 Standalone Release

Delaying until the bug is resolved.

Sean

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim" <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email]
Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2013 2:30:28 AM
Subject: Re: SpiderMonkey 24 Standalone Release

Quite some problems building against a debug build of spidermonkey

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=939505

This, is IMO a bit of a blocker....

Tim

On 16/11/13 05:36, Robin Ehrlich wrote:
> Will Visual Studio 2013 be supported with this release? There is no start-msvc12.bat file.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine

_______________________________________________
dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: SpiderMonkey 24 Standalone Release

Sean Stangl
darkxst verified that his issues were fixed, but Bug 939505 Comment 17 found a JS_DEBUG/DEBUG mismatch. This fixes it:

RC4:  https://people.mozilla.org/~sstangl/mozjs-24.2.0.rc4.tar.bz2
SHA1: ce779081cc11bd0c871c6f303fc4a0091cf4fe66

Planned release on Friday to make sure that the JS_DEBUG issues are actually taken care of. And to just get this thing out the door already.

Sean

----- Original Message -----
From: "Sean Stangl" <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email]
Sent: Monday, December 9, 2013 1:55:44 PM
Subject: Re: SpiderMonkey 24 Standalone Release

Bug 939505 is now resolved. In the meantime, ESR24 bumped to 24.2.0.

RC3:  https://people.mozilla.org/~sstangl/mozjs-24.2.0.rc3.tar.bz2
SHA1: fb5bca92fe7087215048bbdfcf7f37446460da32

Next week is getting into holiday territory, so let's plan for a release later this week on Thursday, December 12. Feedback welcome, particularly on whether the DEBUG issues are verified resolved.

Sean

----- Original Message -----
From: "Sean Stangl" <[hidden email]>
To: "Tim" <[hidden email]>
Cc: [hidden email]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 11:45:22 AM
Subject: Re: SpiderMonkey 24 Standalone Release

Delaying until the bug is resolved.

Sean

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim" <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email]
Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2013 2:30:28 AM
Subject: Re: SpiderMonkey 24 Standalone Release

Quite some problems building against a debug build of spidermonkey

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=939505

This, is IMO a bit of a blocker....

Tim

On 16/11/13 05:36, Robin Ehrlich wrote:
> Will Visual Studio 2013 be supported with this release? There is no start-msvc12.bat file.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine

_______________________________________________
dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: SpiderMonkey 24 Standalone Release

Sean Stangl
I am pleased to finally announce the release of SpiderMonkey (MozJS) 24.2.0 from RC4:

https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/js/mozjs-24.2.0.tar.bz2
SHA1: ce779081cc11bd0c871c6f303fc4a0091cf4fe66

This is the first standalone release that includes the modern IonMonkey JIT compiler, replacing the old JaegerMonkey single-pass JIT compiler from mozjs-17. Performance characteristics may now be different as a result of the switch, but IonMonkey is likely stable for the long-term.

Thanks to everyone involved in finally bringing this release to fruition, especially Waldo, darkxst, and jorendorff.

The next MozJS major release will be MozJS 31, around July 2014. That release will likely introduce exact rooting and generational GC. Further releases should carry relative stabilization in the JSAPI.

Sean

----- Original Message -----
From: "Sean Stangl" <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email]
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 2:39:15 PM
Subject: Re: SpiderMonkey 24 Standalone Release

darkxst verified that his issues were fixed, but Bug 939505 Comment 17 found a JS_DEBUG/DEBUG mismatch. This fixes it:

RC4:  https://people.mozilla.org/~sstangl/mozjs-24.2.0.rc4.tar.bz2
SHA1: ce779081cc11bd0c871c6f303fc4a0091cf4fe66

Planned release on Friday to make sure that the JS_DEBUG issues are actually taken care of. And to just get this thing out the door already.

Sean

----- Original Message -----
From: "Sean Stangl" <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email]
Sent: Monday, December 9, 2013 1:55:44 PM
Subject: Re: SpiderMonkey 24 Standalone Release

Bug 939505 is now resolved. In the meantime, ESR24 bumped to 24.2.0.

RC3:  https://people.mozilla.org/~sstangl/mozjs-24.2.0.rc3.tar.bz2
SHA1: fb5bca92fe7087215048bbdfcf7f37446460da32

Next week is getting into holiday territory, so let's plan for a release later this week on Thursday, December 12. Feedback welcome, particularly on whether the DEBUG issues are verified resolved.

Sean

----- Original Message -----
From: "Sean Stangl" <[hidden email]>
To: "Tim" <[hidden email]>
Cc: [hidden email]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 11:45:22 AM
Subject: Re: SpiderMonkey 24 Standalone Release

Delaying until the bug is resolved.

Sean

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim" <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email]
Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2013 2:30:28 AM
Subject: Re: SpiderMonkey 24 Standalone Release

Quite some problems building against a debug build of spidermonkey

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=939505

This, is IMO a bit of a blocker....

Tim

On 16/11/13 05:36, Robin Ehrlich wrote:
> Will Visual Studio 2013 be supported with this release? There is no start-msvc12.bat file.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine

_______________________________________________
dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-js-engine mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-js-engine