Note: RDF URI references are compatible with the anyURI datatype as
defined by XML schema datatypes [XML-SCHEMA2], constrained to be an
absolute rather than a relative URI reference.
So they do look to be semantically equivalent which would make sense.
Which means the semantics would be preserved in converting the xml:
To the RDF:
Neil Stansbury wrote:
> Semantically, what is the difference between the two dc:Source
> properties below?
> I know one is a literal and the other a resource, I'm just wondering if
> there would be any reason to not treat the literal as if it were a
> <?xml version="1.0"?>
> <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
> <rdf:Description rdf:about="urn:a">
> <dc:Source rdf:resource="urn:b"/>