Re: es-discuss Digest, Vol 125, Issue 13

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: es-discuss Digest, Vol 125, Issue 13

Owen Swerkstrom
That's some interesting stuff kdex!  You know a lot more about Roman
numerals than I.  I was hoping I'd learn some stuff like that; thank
you.

Your point about Roman being nonpositional and therefore a bad fit for
radix is well taken.  That convinces me that at least this
implementation is wrong.  (The other arguments in my mind amount to
"well this could get tricky, so we'd better not even try".  :^)

"Nobody uses Roman numerals" is, I think, the main, real reason this
won't happen.  English is an even more bodged-up mess than Roman
numerals, but people use it, so it's important.  Jav- oops -
EcmaScript itself can fairly be called messy, but humans use it a
great deal, so it's important.  Someday, AIs doing engineering on
quantum computers will argue about whether it would make sense to
sneak in a quick mode to simulate ye olde EcmaScript.  You know, just
as a joke.  :^)


On 7/7/17, [hidden email]
<[hidden email]> wrote:

> Send es-discuss mailing list submissions to
> [hidden email]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> [hidden email]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> [hidden email]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of es-discuss digest..."
>
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
Loading...