_The Real Bev_ spoke thusly on 07/02/2006 12:26 AM:
> Leonidas Jones wrote:
>> The term public was supposed to indicate that the groups were
>> available to
>> developers via usenet. At the time, no one expected to be flooded
>> with end
>> user questions, because, as the watchword of the day went "Mozilla is not
>> for end users!"
> Yeah, but since one of those groups seemed to be the only one dealing
> with what was of most interest to me (linux/mailnews), where else to go?
>> Remember those days, Mozilla was just a testing ground for others
>> (read Netscape) to build their products on.
> Hrm. As an outsider, I thought that the Mozilla stuff was broken off
> from the
> Netscape/AOL/somehow for profit stuff. NS would absorb Moz good stuff, but
> everything was somehow different.