JS component fastload for ff2?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
6 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

JS component fastload for ff2?

Brian Ryner
What do you guys think about taking JS component fastload on the 1.8 branch
for Firefox 2?  This has been on the trunk for awhile (without any
regressions that I've heard about), is a very self-contained change, and is
a pretty sizable startup performance win for large JS components, like some
of the ones in the Safe Browsing extension.

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=279839

Thanks!

--
-Brian
_______________________________________________
dev-planning mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-planning
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: JS component fastload for ff2?

Darin Fisher-2
By how much does it help improve the startup time of "bon echo" with
safe browsing enabled?

-Darin


On 5/11/06, Brian Ryner <[hidden email]> wrote:

> What do you guys think about taking JS component fastload on the 1.8 branch
> for Firefox 2?  This has been on the trunk for awhile (without any
> regressions that I've heard about), is a very self-contained change, and is
> a pretty sizable startup performance win for large JS components, like some
> of the ones in the Safe Browsing extension.
>
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=279839
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> -Brian
> _______________________________________________
> dev-planning mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-planning
>
_______________________________________________
dev-planning mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-planning
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: JS component fastload for ff2?

Mike Connor-4
Also, we should consider that the search service and session restore are
additional large JS components that would likely benefit from this
patch.  I think we want this, if not need this.

-- Mike

Darin Fisher wrote:

> By how much does it help improve the startup time of "bon echo" with
> safe browsing enabled?
>
> -Darin
>
>
> On 5/11/06, Brian Ryner <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> What do you guys think about taking JS component fastload on the 1.8
>> branch
>> for Firefox 2?  This has been on the trunk for awhile (without any
>> regressions that I've heard about), is a very self-contained change,
>> and is
>> a pretty sizable startup performance win for large JS components,
>> like some
>> of the ones in the Safe Browsing extension.
>>
>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=279839
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> --
>> -Brian
>> _______________________________________________
>> dev-planning mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-planning
>>
> _______________________________________________
> dev-planning mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-planning

_______________________________________________
dev-planning mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-planning
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: JS component fastload for ff2?

Tony Chang-2
In reply to this post by Brian Ryner
Darin Fisher <[hidden email]> wrote:
> By how much does it help improve the startup time of "bon echo" with
> safe browsing enabled?

On trunk with sb enabled, I was seeing about a 14-15% regression using
the JS subscript loader.  When I switched to using the preprocessor and
#including the files, I saw about a 3-4% regression.

Tony


> On 5/11/06, Brian Ryner <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> What do you guys think about taking JS component fastload on the 1.8 branch
>> for Firefox 2?  This has been on the trunk for awhile (without any
>> regressions that I've heard about), is a very self-contained change, and is
>> a pretty sizable startup performance win for large JS components, like some
>> of the ones in the Safe Browsing extension.
>>
>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=279839
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> --
>> -Brian
>> _______________________________________________
>> dev-planning mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-planning
>>
_______________________________________________
dev-planning mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-planning
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: JS component fastload for ff2?

Mike Shaver
In reply to this post by Brian Ryner
On 5/11/06, Brian Ryner <[hidden email]> wrote:
> What do you guys think about taking JS component fastload on the 1.8 branch
> for Firefox 2?  This has been on the trunk for awhile (without any
> regressions that I've heard about), is a very self-contained change, and is
> a pretty sizable startup performance win for large JS components, like some
> of the ones in the Safe Browsing extension.
>
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=279839

I'm in favour.  Good win, well-baked.

Mike
_______________________________________________
dev-planning mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-planning
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: JS component fastload for ff2?

Mike Schroepfer
Yep - exactly the sort of thing we need, actually.

Mike

On May 12, 2006, at 11:07 AM, Mike Shaver wrote:

> On 5/11/06, Brian Ryner <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> What do you guys think about taking JS component fastload on the  
>> 1.8 branch
>> for Firefox 2?  This has been on the trunk for awhile (without any
>> regressions that I've heard about), is a very self-contained  
>> change, and is
>> a pretty sizable startup performance win for large JS components,  
>> like some
>> of the ones in the Safe Browsing extension.
>>
>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=279839
>
> I'm in favour.  Good win, well-baked.
>
> Mike
> _______________________________________________
> dev-planning mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-planning

_______________________________________________
dev-planning mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-planning